Subdomains vs. Subdirectories for SEO: Which Is Better in 2025?

In the world of SEO, the choice between using subdomains or subdirectories to organize website content has long been debated. This decision can influence how search engines crawl and index your site, how authority is distributed, and how users perceive your brand. In 2024, with search algorithms emphasizing site quality and coherence more than ever, it’s crucial to understand the trade-offs. The following analysis provides a deep dive into technical SEO considerations and business impacts of subdomains vs. subdirectories, structured to inform both SEO professionals and C-suite executives.

Executive Summary 

• SEO Performance: Keeping content under a single domain (using subdirectories) generally consolidates SEO strength. Subdirectories allow the main site’s domain authority and backlinks to benefit all content, often leading to faster ranking and more search traffic. Real-world case studies have shown significant gains after migrating content from subdomains to subfolders – for example, Monster.com saw a 116% increase in search visibility after moving country sites from subdomains to subdirectories. Conversely, splitting content onto separate subdomains can dilute authority and sometimes hurt organic traffic (one company saw a 47% drop after moving their blog to a subdomain).
• Google’s Stance: Google’s official line is that subdomains and subdirectories are treated equally in terms of crawling and indexing. However, Google also advises “keep content together if it’s meant to be part of one site”. Recent algorithm updates (e.g. the Helpful Content Update in late 2023) underscore this by evaluating site content holistically – low-quality content on a subdomain can now impact the entire site’s rankings . Over the years, Google has improved at associating subdomains with parent domains, but in practice many SEO experts still observe stronger results with subdirectories.
• Business Impact: For businesses, using a single main site with subdirectories often provides a more unified brand experience and simpler user journey. All content lives on one website, which can build greater trust and recognition. It also simplifies analytics and maintenance – one site to track and manage. Subdomains, on the other hand, can be useful for separating very different offerings or regions (e.g. a separate store, forum, or country site) or for technical flexibility (hosting on different servers or platforms). But this comes at the cost of treating each subdomain as a separate property for SEO and analytics. Maintenance overhead and tracking complexity increase with each subdomain.
• Key Recommendation: If the content is closely related to your main business and audience, favor subdirectories to maximize SEO synergy and ease of management. Only use a subdomain when the section truly needs to stand apart (different product line, country/language site, or distinct functionality) and you’re prepared to invest in its independent SEO. Even then, ensure there are clear internal links and consistent branding between the main site and subdomain so that search engines and users recognize them as connected. Always weigh the long-term costs: maintaining multiple subdomains can silo your content and authority, whereas a well-structured subdirectory keeps your SEO efforts consolidated.

Detailed Technical Breakdown

In this section, we delve into the technical SEO factors that distinguish subdomains and subdirectories. We’ll explore how search engines handle crawling and indexing, how link equity and authority are distributed, the effects on content organization and internal linking, impacts on keyword rankings, and algorithmic nuances – both historical and recent.

Indexing and Crawling Differences

From a crawling and indexing standpoint, subdomains are treated as separate sites in many ways. Search engines have to discover and crawl a subdomain independently, often requiring separate XML sitemaps or links from the main site. In Google Search Console, a subdomain must be verified as its own property, indicating Google sees it as a distinct entity. By contrast, a subdirectory is part of the main domain’s URL structure, inheriting the crawl budget and discovery paths of the main site by default.

• Crawl Allocation: Large websites sometimes split content into subdomains to distribute crawling. Google’s John Mueller has noted that using subdomains (or even separate domains) can make sense if Google has trouble crawling everything on one domain. Each subdomain can have its own crawl budget. However, for most sites, crawl budget isn’t a limiting factor. Unless you have millions of pages, a single domain structure with subfolders is usually crawled efficiently as long as it’s well-linked.
• Indexing Behavior: Historically, there were times when subdomains could achieve multiple listings in search results (treating each subdomain as a separate site in the SERPs). This led to abuse by SEOs to dominate results, and Google responded with domain clustering updates to limit repetitive listings. Today, Google’s “site diversity” algorithm typically groups subdomains with the main domain for search results diversity. In other words, you’re less likely to get extra listings by using subdomains – Google will usually show at most one or two results from the entire domain (including subdomains) on a given query. Only in cases where a subdomain is very different and highly relevant might Google treat it separately for an extra result.
• Internal Linking and Discovery: One technical consideration is that if you do use subdomains, you should link to them prominently from the main site (and vice versa) if you want Google to understand the relationship. Google can figure it out, but clear links help. If a subdomain isn’t linked and integrated, search engines might not associate it with the main site’s reputation. In fact, Google has indicated that if you don’t treat a subdomain as part of your site (e.g., no internal links), Google might not either. The same can be true even for subdirectories if they’re completely orphaned from the main site – though that’s uncommon on well-structured sites. In short, proper site architecture and linking matter more than the raw URL format when it comes to crawling and indexing.

Domain Authority and Link Equity Distribution

One of the biggest SEO differences between subdomains and subdirectories lies in how link equity (authority) is distributed. Domain Authority (a composite metric often used by SEOs to gauge ranking potential) tends to be consolidated when using subdirectories, whereas subdomains require building authority separately.

• Subdirectories Inherit Authority: Content placed in a subfolder benefits from the authority of the root domain by default. Every backlink to your main domain can indirectly help the subdirectory pages, and internal links from your well-established pages can pass “SEO juice” easily. For example, if example.com has many quality backlinks and you launch example.com/blog/, that blog section starts off bolstered by the domain’s reputation. As a result, subdirectory pages often index and rank faster than they would on a brand-new subdomain. SEO experts widely agree that consolidating content under one domain strengthens overall rankings. Stephen Kenwright, for instance, observed multiple brands gain organic traffic by migrating country-specific subdomains into subfolders, as the link equity from strong markets flowed to the whole site.
• Subdomains Dilute (or Divide) Authority: A subdomain is essentially seen as a separate site earning its own backlink profile. Links to blog.example.com don’t automatically count toward example.com (and vice versa). If your main site has 100 great links and your blog on a subdomain has 10 different links, search engines don’t sum these up – the subdomain stands on its own merit. Cyrus Shepard has pointed out that moving content into a subdomain rarely gives any SEO boost, whereas moving out of a subdomain into a folder often does, because of this consolidation effect. In practical terms, running a subdomain means you’ll need separate link building efforts to achieve the same authority that a subdirectory would have gotten “for free” from the main site’s backlinks.
• Example – Monster.com vs. IWantMyName: To illustrate, consider two real cases. Monster.com had job listing sites on country subdomains (e.g., jobs.monster.co.uk). When they moved those into subdirectories (monster.co.uk/jobs/), the UK site’s visibility jumped dramatically, indicating that the main domain’s strength now fully applied to the jobs section. On the other hand, the team at IWantMyName moved their blog from a folder to a subdomain in 2014 and saw a 47% drop in organic traffic – a strong sign that the blog could no longer piggyback on the domain authority of the main site. (Their traffic recovered only after reverting the change and possibly other fixes.)

Visibility index charts from Sistrix: Monster.com’s country sites saw a sharp rise in SEO visibility (blue shaded area) after migrating from subdomains to subdirectories. The move consolidated authority under one domain, leading to substantial organic traffic gains.

Pageviews of IWantMyName’s blog: a significant drop occurred after switching the blog to a subdomain in July 2014. This suggests the subdomain lost the benefit of the main site’s authority, resulting in lower traffic until changes were made.

• Preventing Authority Splitting: If you must use subdomains (for reasons discussed later), there are ways to mitigate authority loss. Strong cross-linking between the main site and subdomain can help share some equity (for example, linking your main navigation to the subdomain and vice versa). Also, consistent branding and relevance can encourage Google to treat the subdomain as part of the whole. But even with these measures, most SEO specialists err on the side of “one domain, one site” to build a powerhouse of authority rather than two weaker sites.

Content Silos and Internal Linking

How you structure content on your site can affect SEO through internal linking and thematic relevance. Both subdomains and subdirectories allow siloing content by topic, but they do so differently:

• Subdirectories for Thematic Siloing: Subfolders naturally create a hierarchy under the main site. For example, example.com/blog/seo-guide clearly ties the content to the main domain and a section (blog). This makes it easy to weave internal links between the blog and other parts of the site (product pages, home page, etc.). SEO siloing – grouping related content and interlinking it – is straightforward within one domain. An internal link from example.com/product to example.com/blog/seo-guide is a normal intra-site link carrying full weight. As Bruce Clay’s team (pioneers of “siloing”) note, how you organize content in subdirectories can make or break SEO because it influences internal link structure and crawlability.
• Subdomains as Separate Silos: Using a subdomain is like creating a separate mini-website. blog.example.com has its own set of pages. Internal links between blog.example.com and www.example.com are technically external links (they cross domains). While you can still link between them, many CMS and analytics systems treat them as different sites. This separation can hinder the seamless flow of internal PageRank. For instance, a blog post on a subdomain might not effectively boost a product page on the main domain by linking to it, in the way it would have if the blog were a subdirectory. One SEO expert explains that if you split a blog onto a subdomain, “you are splitting the topical authority across two websites, instead of bundling it together. Blog content that should support main site pages with internal links doesn’t work as well when your blog is on a separate site.” In essence, content intended to support core business pages (like blogs, resources, case studies) typically performs better as part of the main site (subfolders) so that every internal link reinforces the whole.
• Content Segmentation Use-Case: On the flip side, if you have content that truly doesn’t align with the main site’s theme or goals, a subdomain silo might be appropriate. For example, a company might host a user forum or a documentation wiki on a subdomain (community.example.com or docs.example.com) to keep it slightly separate from the marketing site. The content is siloed away to avoid confusing users or diluting the main site’s theme. From an SEO view, this content won’t directly boost the main site via internal links, but that might be acceptable if the audiences are different. John Mueller’s advice aligns with this: if the content “can live on its own” and isn’t meant to be tightly integrated, a subdomain is suitable. Just note that by isolating it, you won’t reap much SEO benefit for your main site from that silo.
• Information Architecture: Using subdirectories keeps your site architecture unified, which can help search engines understand context. For example, example.com/solutions/finance/ and example.com/blog/finance-trends both share the “finance” theme in the URL and site context. This could enhance topical relevance if interlinked. In contrast, finance.example.com might develop its own authority on finance, but search engines won’t automatically connect it to example.com unless you explicitly link them. So, from a pure SEO architecture perspective, subdirectories enable a tighter, more coherent site structure, whereas subdomains create distinct sections that require extra effort to interlink effectively.

Impact on Keyword Rankings and Search Visibility

What is the tangible impact on rankings and visibility in search results? This is often the core of the subdomain vs. subfolder debate. While results can vary by case, there are some notable trends and examples:

• Faster Ranking with Subfolders: Because of the authority and indexing advantages discussed, content on subdirectories often has a head start in Google’s rankings. Multiple SEO experiments and case studies have shown that migrating content from a subdomain to a subdirectory can improve keyword rankings for those pages. One analysis found that subdirectories tend to rank faster and more effectively on the first page of Google compared to subdomains. This is likely due to the instant credibility borrowed from the main domain. For example, when SEO agency Embarque moved a client’s content from a subdomain to a folder, they cited reaching 9.6 million yearly organic visits within 12 months post-migration (though such dramatic success probably also involved content strategy and link building). The general point is, if all other factors are equal, Google has an easier time viewing subdirectory content as part of your established site, which can translate to better rankings for that content.
• Keyword Cannibalization Myths: Some have wondered if having content on a subdomain might rank better because it won’t “cannibalize” the main site or cause internal competition in Google’s eyes. In reality, Google is pretty good at ranking the most relevant content, whether it’s on a subdomain or subfolder. There isn’t strong evidence that separating content onto a subdomain avoids keyword cannibalization; in fact, it might reduce the benefit of having one authoritative site on a topic. A well-organized site using subdirectories can target a broad range of keywords without issues, as long as each page has a distinct purpose. Subdomains could appear as separate search results for the same query (in cases where Google treats them as different sites), but the 2019 diversity update made that less common. So, using a subdomain to double-dip on rankings is not a reliable strategy, and it sacrifices the ranking power that comes from unifying your content’s authority.
• Real-World SERP Data: A recent 2024 study analyzed over 20,000 Google search results worldwide to see which site structures perform best. The findings were illuminating: over half of top-ranking results were country-specific domains (ccTLDs like .co.uk), but notably, subdirectories were the second most prevalent structure in the top 3 positions across the board . Subdomains accounted for only ~3% of the top results overall, appearing mainly in certain multilingual market scenarios . This suggests that the vast majority of high-ranking sites choose either separate domains for each region or use subfolders – relatively few use subdomains for major sections of their site. While this is a broad analysis and not a direct cause-and-effect proof, it aligns with the idea that most SEO-savvy sites consolidate their content (either on the main domain or country domains), and fewer rely on subdomains for large content sections.
• Case Study – GitHub’s Blog: As a counterpoint, there are cases where moving between subdomain and subdirectory didn’t change much. GitHub’s engineering blog is a famous example: it was originally at github.com/blog (a subdirectory), then moved to blog.github.com (subdomain), and later to an entirely separate domain github.blog. According to Patrick Stox at Ahrefs, each transition caused only temporary flux, with no lasting drop in rankings attributable purely to URL structure. GitHub had such strong domain authority and community interest that as long as they redirected properly, the content continued to perform. This highlights that if a site is extremely authoritative (or if the content is highly unique and sought-after), the subdomain vs. subfolder choice alone may not make or break rankings. What matters is that Google can crawl and users can find the content. That said, most businesses aren’t in GitHub’s enviable position of having millions of branded searches and links, so the safer bet for growing rankings is to use subdirectories for the reasons outlined earlier.
• Monitoring Rankings During Moves: It’s worth noting that whenever you change URL structure (either direction), there can be temporary ranking fluctuations. Google may take time to re-evaluate and consolidate signals. Sometimes new URLs (on a new subdomain or new folder) get treated with a bit of skepticism until re-crawled and re-indexed thoroughly. Patrick Stox noted that Google might temporarily apply some “inheritance” of signals at a site or folder level for new pages until it figures out their proper place. This can cause short-term dips or boosts that aren’t permanent. So, if you migrate content, don’t panic at short-term changes – watch the trend over a few weeks or months. In successful migrations (with 301 redirects and consistent content), you should end up at equal or better rankings once Google finishes processing.

Algorithmic Considerations (Google Updates & Stance Changes)

Google’s algorithms and guidelines related to site structure have evolved over time. It’s important to consider how certain updates or policies can affect (or be affected by) your choice of subdomain vs. subdirectory:

• Early Days – Exploits and Panda: In the late 2000s, some webmasters used subdomains to manipulate search results, creating multiple subdomains to occupy several spots on Google for the same query. Google closed this loophole with host clustering changes that generally group results by domain. The Google Panda update (2011) targeted low-quality content on a site-wide level. In Panda’s aftermath, the content farm HubPages famously moved all user-generated articles from the main site into individual author subdomains (e.g., authorname.hubpages.com). This was done so that a few poor-performing articles wouldn’t drag down the rankings of the entire site – each author’s subdomain would be assessed separately. Initially, this subdomain strategy helped HubPages recover some Google traffic, implying Google was treating subdomains almost like separate sites for quality scoring. However, this workaround was not a long-term solution industry-wide, and it underscored that Google at the time applied certain signals (like Panda penalties) at the domain or subdomain level. Since then, Google has gotten more granular and also more holistic in evaluating sites.
• Google’s Official Line: Google has consistently stated that there is no inherent ranking preference for subdomains or subdirectories – what matters is that you organize your content logically and provide a good user experience. Matt Cutts (former head of Google webspam) said as far back as 2007 that you can choose either, and reiterated in 2012 to do what’s easiest for you. John Mueller has repeatedly said “Google web search is fine with using either”, and that one should pick a URL structure and stick with it long-term. In a 2018 Hangout, he explained “in general, we see these the same… If it’s the same site, try to keep things together… use subdomains where things are really kind of slightly different.”. This hints that even Google advocates keeping closely related content on one site. The official word is: you won’t be penalized solely for choosing one over the other, so long as the content is high quality. Google’s algorithms do not have an outright “subfolder rank boost” or “subdomain penalty” coded in. The differences arise from how links and content are evaluated, as we’ve discussed.
• The Reality vs. Google’s Statements: Many in the SEO community have been skeptical of the “equal treatment” claim. They point out, for example, that Google’s own systems (Analytics, Search Console) treat subdomains separately, which suggests you really are operating two sites. Some leaked insight in 2024 added fuel to this debate – analysis of a batch of leaked search ranking factors implied that Google might internally calculate certain metrics on a per-subdomain basis. This led to claims that “Google has been lying” and that subdomains truly have their own rankings independent of the main domain. It’s wise to take such claims with a grain of salt, but they align with what many SEOs observe in practice: a blog on a subdomain often doesn’t help the main site rank, whereas a blog in a folder does. The likely explanation is not a sinister lie by Google, but simply the natural outcome of separate vs. unified site signals. Google’s search engineers say subdomains can rank as well as subfolders if done right – the caveat is that “done right” means you have to put in the SEO work to make that subdomain just as reputable and connected.
• Helpful Content & Site-wide Signals (2022–2024): A very significant development came with Google’s Helpful Content Update (HCU), first launched in 2022 and updated in 2023. This update introduced a site-wide signal that downgrades sites with lots of unhelpful content. In September 2023, Google explicitly updated their guidance to warn site owners about hosting content on separate sections. They stated: “If you host third-party content on your main site or in your subdomains, understand that such content may be included in site-wide signals we generate, such as the helpfulness of content.” . In plain terms, Google will not ignore low-quality content just because it’s on a subdomain. If you’re renting out subdomains or segregating content that isn’t closely monitored, Google might still consider it part of your overall site for quality evaluations. They even recommend blocking such content from indexing if it’s not truly part of your core site purpose . This change was aimed at people who were trying to game the system by, say, hosting lots of user-generated or AI content on a subdomain to avoid tarnishing their main domain. Google’s move here indicates an evolution: historically, subdomains could be used to compartmentalize, but going into 2024, Google is looking at the whole picture. Content largely independent of your main brand might need to be noindexed or kept off your main site’s domain entirely if you want to ensure your primary site stays high quality.
• 2024 and Beyond – Best Practices: As of 2024, Google’s algorithms continue to reward original, useful, authoritative content and a good user experience. Within that framework, the subdomain vs. subdirectory choice should be guided by your content strategy. There is no algorithm named “SubdomainRank” or such – it’s about how all the pieces fit together. The core algorithm (including recent core updates in 2023/2024) doesn’t directly say “folder good, subdomain bad,” but indirectly, if a subdomain lacks E-A-T (expertise, authority, trust) or links, it won’t rank as well. Meanwhile, content on a strong main domain with integrated signals will usually have an edge. Google’s Site Diversity update (2019) ensures you usually won’t get more than two listings from the same root domain on one page, so having a subdomain won’t let you monopolize results, except maybe for branded queries where sitelinks might show subdomains. Even that, Google now shows sitelinks from subdomains as part of one site (e.g., Disney has subdomains that appear as sitelinks under the main domain result). All this points to a simple trend: Google increasingly views a website holistically. If your content is all part of the same brand or entity, you might as well keep it on one domain unless there’s a compelling technical reason not to.

Business Impact Analysis

Beyond the pure technical SEO implications, the subdomain vs. subdirectory decision can have broad business effects. These include impacts on traffic and conversions (as seen in case studies), branding considerations, user experience differences, analytics and KPI tracking, as well as cost and maintenance factors. Here we analyze those aspects, providing examples of companies that made notable choices.

Case Studies: SEO Wins and Losses

Real-world examples help illustrate how the decision has played out for companies:

• Monster.com’s Success: Monster, a global job search platform, historically used country-specific subdomains (e.g., jobs.monster.de for Germany). They migrated these to subdirectories under the main country domains (e.g., monster.de/jobs). The result was a dramatic improvement: Monster’s UK site saw a +116% increase in search visibility after the migration. Essentially, the authority of monster.co.uk was fully shared with the /jobs section once it became part of the same site. This case is often cited as proof that consolidating into subdirectories can unlock SEO potential that was hindered when the sections were siloed on subdomains. The graph of Monster’s visibility index (see figure above) shows a clear upward jump once the switch was made, after a long period of flat performance on the subdomain.
• IWantMyName’s Setback: On the flip side, IWantMyName, a domain registrar, moved their blog from a subdirectory (iwantmyname.com/blog) to a subdomain (blog.iwantmyname.com) in mid-2014. The outcome was not happy: they experienced a 47% drop in organic traffic to the blog shortly after. This suggests that Google did not carry over the main site’s authority to the new subdomain, and the content lost rankings. The team eventually reversed the move. This case is a cautionary tale: even if Google says subdomains can work, you may lose ground in the interim and potentially for the long term if the subdomain can’t build up its own reputation. It underscores that moving to a subdomain is essentially launching a new site in SEO terms, with all the risks that entails.
• HubSpot’s Blog and Others: HubSpot, a well-known marketing software company, used to host its blog on blog.hubspot.com (a subdomain). In later years, HubSpot transitioned to hubspot.com/blog for a more integrated approach. Many large companies have made similar moves toward unification. Another example: Wirecutter, a product review site acquired by The New York Times, was initially on its own domain. The NYTimes eventually migrated Wirecutter to a subdirectory (nytimes.com/wirecutter). This was done to consolidate branding and SEO authority, and indeed it likely helped Wirecutter benefit from the NYT’s strong domain trust. According to one SEO analysis, having Wirecutter as a section of nytimes.com means it’s “not affected by Google updates while other smaller sites are” – a suggestion that the protective umbrella of a powerful domain can shield content from some algorithm volatility. While that may not be 100% foolproof, it’s true that Google is less likely to consider a section of NYTimes as low-quality in isolation, compared to if Wirecutter were a stand-alone smaller site.
• Mention.com & Content Additions: It’s important to note that correlation isn’t always causation in these cases. The SEO community has documented cases where moving to a subdirectory coincided with growth, but not necessarily caused it. For instance, mention.com moved their blog from a subdomain to a folder in 2016. Ahrefs’ analysis didn’t see an immediate lift from the move itself – the big traffic growth came later when they added a lot of new content. The migration simply didn’t hurt, and once they bolstered the site with more pages and links, traffic climbed. Similarly, some case studies that report huge gains after a migration often involve other changes like better internal linking (which is easier in a folder structure) or a general site overhaul. Nonetheless, it’s telling that we have many stories of gains from subdomain→subdirectory moves and very few (if any) stories of gains from subdirectory→subdomain moves. Companies that moved blogs or other sections off the main domain usually did so for non-SEO reasons and often ended up reversing course to regain lost SEO ground.
• When Subdomains Succeed: Are there companies that thrive with subdomains? Yes, particularly when the subdomains serve distinct purposes or audiences:
• Blogspot/Medium: These platforms host user blogs on subdomains (e.g., user.medium.com). Each subdomain is its own little site. SEO-wise, the platform’s domain (medium.com) doesn’t automatically impart authority to each user’s subdomain, but those with great content still rank. The business model here is different (multitude of independent publishers), so it’s an example of subdomains being necessary for segmentation.
• Global Brands: Google itself is a prime example of subdomain usage – think of maps.google.com, news.google.com, etc. Google uses subdomains for very different products. Each has such strong brand recognition and unique content that they rank on their own (and Google certainly has no trouble getting indexed!). For a normal business, a comparable use might be having a support portal or community forum on a subdomain. If that content is user-driven or significantly different, it can live separately without hurting the main marketing site. Microsoft, for instance, has docs.microsoft.com (now docs.microsoft.com is moving under learn.microsoft.com subdomain) for documentation – a distinct user segment.
• Regional Sites: Some companies put different languages or countries on subdomains (e.g., fr.example.com for French). While many SEO experts recommend subfolders for internationalization, subdomains or separate domains (ccTLDs) can also work and some big sites choose them. The key is providing localized content and building local authority. If each country team handles its SEO, a subdomain might be treated like a separate site in that market. The downside is it won’t automatically benefit from the main “.com” site’s success.

In summary, the case studies indicate that integrating content (subdirectories) tends to correlate with better SEO outcomes in terms of traffic and rankings, whereas segregating content (subdomains) is often done for non-SEO reasons and can entail an SEO cost. Businesses that have treated subdomains as an extension of their main site often circle back to integration when search performance is a priority.

Branding and User Experience

The choice between subdomain and subdirectory can subtly influence how users perceive your brand and navigate your web properties:

• Unified Brand Presence: Using subdirectories keeps everything on one domain, reinforcing a single brand. Users see yourwebsite.com/section and implicitly know they are still on your site. This consistency can build trust and familiarity. For example, a customer reading your blog at yourcompany.com/blog will feel like the blog content is part of your company’s expertise. If the blog were at blog.yourcompany.com and possibly had a different look, some users might wonder if it’s officially part of the company or an external site. Consistent domain and design means less friction – one login across the site, shared navigation menus, etc. From a marketing perspective, all your traffic accrues to one domain, which can simplify things like retargeting and personalization.
• Segmentation and Brand Differentiation: On the other hand, subdomains can be used to differentiate parts of the business. If you have a conglomerate or very distinct divisions, a subdomain offers a way to give a section its own identity while still under the company umbrella. For instance, store.example.com might have a different brand style than the informational pages on www.example.com. Customers might not mind a subdomain if it’s clearly meant to be a separate experience (like a shop, forum, or a microsite for a campaign). Google’s advice mirrors this: use a subdomain if the content “stands on its own” relative to the main site. Just be cautious – if the branding is too different, users may get confused or not realize two subdomains are related. Many companies counteract this by providing consistent headers or footers across their subdomains, or by explicitly linking between them (“Looking for our store? Go to store.example.com”).
• User Trust and URL Recognition: Average users may not immediately notice if they move to a subdomain (since the root domain is visible after the dot). However, savvy users do notice, and any URL change can introduce a moment of hesitation. Phishing awareness has trained people to look at domains: if I click a link on example.com and suddenly I’m at login.examplesecure.com – is that legit or not? Using obvious subdomain names can help (e.g., support.example.com is clearly your support site). When everything is under one domain with simple folders, users don’t have to think about it at all. From a UX perspective, keeping users on the same domain is generally smoother (no extra logins or banner notices needed about “You are now leaving our main site”).
• Navigational Flow: With subdirectories, it’s easier to provide seamless navigation. Your main site’s menu can list “Blog” and it just goes to /blog. On a subdomain, the user might have to essentially jump to a different site – sometimes companies don’t integrate the navigation, so the blog might not easily lead back to the main site or share the same menu. This can hurt session duration or cross-page exploration. For C-suite concerns: a fragmented user experience can mean less cross-selling or fewer conversions, as visitors might not transition from your content section to your product section as fluidly. Many companies eventually merge subdomain content back in to create a single customer journey on the website.
• Email and Marketing Implications: A smaller note – when you share URLs in marketing materials or emails, a single domain looks cleaner. If your blog or shop is on a subdomain, you may have to clarify that it’s still official (e.g., “Visit our store at store.example.com”). Not a huge deal, but brand-wise, one domain is simpler to promote. However, subdomains can be branded too (like Apple’s iCloud uses icloud.com separately from apple.com, for distinct branding). If the subdomain name is something catchy or essential to brand identity, it might actually be a deliberate branding choice (like product names as subdomains).

In conclusion, for a cohesive brand image and user experience, subdirectories have an advantage. They keep users in one place and reinforce one brand. Subdomains may be justified for separate branding or functional reasons, but businesses should ensure that users know they’re still dealing with the same company – usually by maintaining consistent logos, design elements, and clear links back to the main site.

Analytics and Performance Tracking

From an operational standpoint, having content on different subdomains vs. one domain impacts how you track and analyze site performance. This is a key concern for marketing teams:

• Unified Analytics (Subdirectories): When everything is on one domain, tracking is straightforward. Tools like Google Analytics consider pageviews on example.com/page1 and example.com/blog/page2 as part of the same property. User journeys from one section to another are captured seamlessly. You can get holistic metrics for the entire site without special configuration – one session can span multiple sections. Conversion tracking (say, a user reads a blog post then goes to /product/ and signs up) works out of the box. Simply put, data is centralized. This makes it easier to attribute conversions or user engagement: you don’t lose referral data between subdomains. For instance, if a user goes from blog.example.com to www.example.com and your analytics isn’t set up to handle that, it might break the session into two, making it look like the user “started fresh” on the main site with a referral from the blog.
• Cross-Domain/Subdomain Tracking: With subdomains, you often need additional configuration to track users across them. In Google Analytics Universal, this meant setting the cookie domain to the root domain and perhaps adding referral exclusions so your subdomains don’t count as referrals. In GA4 or other modern analytics, it’s a bit easier with measurement IDs, but you still have to ensure all subdomains are sending data to the same property and that user IDs or cookies persist. It’s doable – many companies track multiple subdomains in one GA property – but it’s an extra step that can be misconfigured. If not done correctly, you might see, for example, a bunch of self-referrals or inflated user counts because the same person is counted twice when they move between subdomains. Having subdirectories avoids these headaches; a user is consistently tracked.
• Separate Analytics Needs: In some cases, a company might want separate analytics for a subdomain, especially if it’s run by a different team. For example, an online education subdomain (academy.example.com) might be managed separately, so they have their own analytics property. This silo can be an advantage organizationally, but you’ll lose the unified view. The business should decide if that separation is worth it. For most C-suite reports, the total web performance of the brand is what matters, and combining data from multiple web properties is an added task.
• Search Console and SEO Monitoring: Similar issues arise in Google Search Console (GSC). Google requires verifying each subdomain separately to see its search performance data. If your blog is a subdomain, you need a GSC property for it, in addition to the one for your main site, and perhaps a combined domain property. This means extra overhead to monitor impressions, clicks, index coverage, etc., across properties. It’s not insurmountable, but it’s easier when your content is all under one property. For example, subdomains won’t automatically inherit any Manual Actions or security issues flagged on the main domain and vice versa – they’re separate in GSC’s eyes. While that isolation could be beneficial if one section had problems (it wouldn’t directly pull down the others in GSC), it also means you might overlook issues if you forget to check all properties.
• Marketing and Attribution: Think about attribution of leads or conversions. If a user visits your blog (subdomain) and later comes to the main site to sign up, how do you attribute that assist? In one domain scenario, multi-touch attribution models can see that the blog page was an entry point. In a two-domain scenario, you might see the blog as a referrer. It’s workable but not as clean. For advertising campaigns, you might drive traffic to either the main site or a subdomain – consolidating them means one less factor to consider when analyzing campaign performance. Also, A/B testing tools and personalization platforms often treat subdomains as separate domains; you might need to deploy scripts in multiple places and can’t easily run one test across the whole user journey if it spans subdomains.

In summary, from a data and analytics perspective, subdirectories simplify tracking and give a more holistic picture. Subdomains introduce fragmentation that requires careful setup to overcome. For a data-driven business, the fewer barriers in your analytics, the better. This is why many companies eventually integrate their blog or other sections back into the main site: it makes KPI tracking and user analysis much easier, ensuring no drop-off in understanding user behavior.

Cost and Maintenance Implications

Every additional sub-site you maintain has cost implications – not just in money, but in time and resources. Here’s how subdomains vs. subdirectories stack up on the operational front:

• Infrastructure and Development: A subdirectory is usually part of the same web server and application as the main site. It can reuse templates, code, and integrations you’ve already built. A subdomain, however, might be run on a different server or platform – and often that’s why companies choose subdomains (e.g., host a blog on WordPress while the main site is on a different CMS). This can increase infrastructure complexity. You may need separate hosting, ensure both environments are secure and fast, and handle integrations between them. For example, deploying a new header design means updating it in two places if your subdomain is a different system. Maintenance overhead grows with each separate site. If one site goes down, it might not affect the other, but you now have to monitor multiple systems.
• Technical SEO Maintenance: More subdomains means more things to audit: separate XML sitemaps, separate robots.txt files, duplicate content checks across domains, and ensuring each subdomain is mobile-friendly, fast, and up to technical standards. If you change domain structure (like migrating subdomain to folder or vice versa), that’s a significant SEO project with 301 redirects to implement carefully so as not to lose traffic. In contrast, keeping everything in a folder avoids such projects altogether. As Barry Schwartz noted via John Mueller, subdomains can complicate things like DNS, security (SSL certificates), and Content Security Policies. For instance, a wildcard SSL might cover all subdomains, but if not, you need separate certificates. Content Security Policy headers need to include each subdomain if they’re communicating. These are technical hassles that a single-domain setup sidesteps.
• Content Management and Workflow: With one website, your content team can publish pages uniformly. With a subdomain on a different CMS, the team might have to learn two systems or have two teams. This can lead to inconsistency in content quality or style. It also might cost more if you’re licensing software for each. On the analytics side, as discussed, you might pay for multiple properties or have to invest time in combining data. If you hire an SEO agency or consultant, they may charge more to handle multiple sites versus one consolidated site.
• Monetary Costs: Running multiple subdomains might incur direct costs if they are hosted separately or require additional tools. For example, if your main site is on a high-performance host and you put your blog on a cheaper host via a subdomain, you might save a bit on hosting, but at the risk of the blog’s performance. Generally, the cost difference in hosting is minor compared to the potential lost revenue if SEO is weaker. Also consider domain costs: subdomains themselves don’t cost (they’re free under your domain), but sometimes companies consider separate domains or buy special subdomains – those could add to expenses. However, the bigger cost is usually human time: maintaining updates, ensuring security patches on both sites, duplicating efforts like templates or GDPR compliance banners on two systems, etc.
• Scaling and Future Changes: Sometimes subdomains are used to allow different parts of a site to scale independently. For instance, an app or user account section might be on a subdomain to isolate it for performance reasons. If that’s important (maybe one part of your site gets massive traffic or needs different server location), a subdomain can be beneficial. But for most content sections, scaling is not a problem that requires a subdomain. Modern web servers and CDNs can handle a lot on one domain. As your business grows, consider whether you want to manage 5 mini-sites or one large site – the latter is often more efficient if you plan properly. Each additional subdomain could also mean additional monitoring (uptime monitors, security scans). Companies that have consolidated often cite ease of maintenance as a win.
• Migration Costs: If you start with one approach and later change, that’s a project cost. For example, many companies that initially put their blog on a subdomain eventually decide to merge it into the main site for SEO reasons. That migration requires developer time for URL mapping, SEO time for planning and monitoring, possible loss of traffic during transition, and content audits. Doing it right can recoup traffic, but it’s a non-trivial undertaking. So it’s worth trying to make the correct strategic choice early to avoid such back-and-forth.

From a business perspective, consolidating web content into one site (with subdirectories) tends to be more cost-effective and easier to maintain in the long run. Subdomains might offer flexibility in certain scenarios (different tech stacks, delegation to different teams, etc.), but they introduce duplication of effort. For a lean operation, fewer moving parts means fewer chances for error and lower ongoing costs.

Historical and 2025 Perspectives

The debate over subdomains vs. subdirectories is not new – it has a history nearly as long as SEO itself. Understanding how Google’s handling and advice have evolved can inform today’s best practices, especially in light of recent developments up to 2024.

• Early SEO Era: In the 2000s, some webmasters leveraged subdomains to gain extra search listings or to target exact-match keywords (like creating keyword-rich.subdomain.example.com). The search algorithms were less sophisticated, and subdomains could rank independently, sometimes leading to one company dominating results. Google’s response was to tighten up how many results from one domain (including subdomains) could appear. Even back then, Google’s public message (often via Matt Cutts) was that you won’t get a special boost from using a subdomain or subfolder – use what’s logical. But due to loopholes, many assumed subdomains had an edge. By around 2007–2009, Google rolled out changes to reduce “host crowding,” making subdomains generally count as part of the main host for limiting results. So the technical hack value of subdomains diminished over a decade ago.
• 2011–2013 (Panda and Beyond): Google’s Panda update (fighting “thin content”) was a wake-up call that site-wide quality matters. HubPages’ move to subdomains (mentioned earlier) is a notable historical footnote – it showed that at that time Google would evaluate subdomains somewhat separately for content quality. HubPages essentially sacrificed the unity of their site to protect good content from the bad. This worked short-term, and even Google’s Amit Singhal acknowledged that they were looking into that scenario. However, Google’s algorithms got more precise and such drastic measures became less effective. Panda later got integrated and refined, and Google began focusing on individual pages and sections without needing webmasters to manually silo content. By mid-2010s, the prevailing SEO advice was shifting: rather than splitting content to avoid penalties, improve the content or remove bad content.
• 2015–2019 (Consolidation Trend): During these years, Google’s stance remained “we handle both,” but more case studies from SEO pros showed subdirectory consolidation yielding positive results. Many publishers that had spun off blogs or mobile sites as subdomains started bringing them back in:
• The rise of responsive design made m.example.com (mobile subdomains) unnecessary and even harmful to SEO (due to duplicate content/confusion), so best practice became a single site for mobile/desktop.
• International SEO debates continued: some favored subdomains for languages, others subfolders, others country domains. Google launched hreflang to help, which works either way. However, evidence grew that consolidating languages on one domain (especially if one language site had most backlinks) could lift the weaker ones. This led some companies to migrate, like the earlier Stephen Kenwright example of moving international subdomains into subfolders to boost underperforming locales.
• In 2018, a bit of a PR controversy occurred when John Mueller’s comments (saying subdomains = subfolders mostly) were challenged by SEOs who felt that glossed over the complexity . It highlighted a disconnect: Google insists the crawler doesn’t care, but SEOs care because of how links and authority work in reality.
• 2019 Site Diversity Update: As noted, in June 2019 Google explicitly stated that for purposes of showing diverse results, subdomains would usually be counted as part of the root domain. They also added that if a subdomain is very different, they might treat it separately to show more relevant results. This update was not about ranking per se, but about presentation of results. The takeaway for site owners was: don’t expect that you can own more of the first page by using subdomains – Google usually won’t let that happen. So, the historical tactic of having multiple subdomains to crowd the SERP was officially dead. That further encouraged the mindset of “might as well keep it all together.”
• 2020–2021 (Passage Ranking and Others): These years didn’t introduce anything directly about subdomains/folders, but Google’s improvements in understanding content (BERT, passage indexing) meant that even large single sites could have very diverse content and Google could surface the right piece. It reduced the need to isolate content. Meanwhile, anecdotal evidence kept favoring subdirectories for new projects if SEO was a priority from the start.
• 2022–2023 (Helpful Content & EEAT): The Helpful Content Update (HCU) in late 2022, updated in 2023, as discussed, is a recent shift towards site-level evaluation of content usefulness. The added guidance in 2023 about third-party content on subdomains is probably the most direct indication from Google in years that subdomain content isn’t automatically siloed away in their eyes. This could be seen as Google closing the chapter that started with HubPages in 2011 – saying effectively, “If you’re hosting content that’s not really part of your main site’s purpose, even on a subdomain, we might still consider it in evaluating your site. So maybe don’t do that.” For businesses, this means you shouldn’t think you can hide a bunch of low-quality or AI-generated content on a subdomain and avoid a ranking hit. It will catch up with the whole site’s reputation. On the positive side, if you have useful content on a subdomain that is aligned with your site, it likely contributes to your EEAT (Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust) signals across the board.
• 2025 and Forward: Google hasn’t introduced any specific algorithm in 2025 solely about site structure. The core updates remain about content quality, relevance, and overall site authority. The consensus among SEO experts in 2025 is that subdirectories are usually the best choice for SEO when launching new sections, but “it depends” still holds for certain cases. 

There is greater awareness now of the edge cases where subdomains might make sense – for example, if you have a community that could potentially have user-generated content you don’t want indexed, you might isolate it (and even noindex it as Google suggests if it’s truly independent). 

Also, performance considerations: some sites offload heavy assets to subdomains (like images or scripts) – this is more of a technical CDN strategy and doesn’t affect SEO much (serving static resources from subdomains is fine, since it’s not content pages). 

Importantly, the priority is user experience and content quality. Google’s Martin Splitt recently reiterated that “URL structure is mostly for you; Google is fine with whatever, just keep it consistent.” In practice, consistency and logical organization help avoid mistakes that hurt SEO (like forgetting to link or duplicating content).

In summary, historically subdomains were sometimes used to game or workaround Google, but Google adapted. By 2025, the playing field is such that the structural choice should be made for user and business reasons, with a bias toward consolidation for SEO advantages. Google’s algorithms now treat obvious attempts to silo content with suspicion if it looks like it’s just trying to manipulate signals. The old mantra “content is king” has an addendum: “but site context matters.” So build your site in a way that all your good content contributes to one great site, unless you have a very good reason to split it.

Pros and Cons Comparison

To crystallize the differences between using subdomains and subdirectories, below is a clear comparison of their advantages and disadvantages:

• Subdomains – Pros:
  
  • Offer separation of content when needed – good for distinctly different content, products, or user groups (e.g., forum.example.com separate from main site).
  • Flexible hosting and tech stack: You can run a subdomain on a different server or platform without affecting the main site. Useful if a section requires special software or isolation for performance.
  • Can target specific audiences or regions with tailored experiences and even use different keywords without directly impacting the main site’s optimization.
  • Autonomy for teams: A subdomain can be managed by a different team or even a third-party, allowing independent operation (common for support sites or franchise microsites).
• Subdomains – Cons:
  
  • Treated as separate by search engines – no automatic sharing of authority, so SEO efforts (backlinks, content) start from scratch for the subdomain. This can dilute your overall SEO power.
  • Require separate analytics and search console tracking setups, complicating data analysis and SEO monitoring.
  • Internal linking benefits are reduced: Links between main site and subdomain are not full “internal” links, possibly carrying less weight for SEO and providing a less seamless user navigation.
  • Higher maintenance overhead: More DNS management, possible separate SSL, duplicate site frameworks, and increased risk of inconsistent user experience if not carefully managed.
  • If content is not clearly distinct, a subdomain can confuse users or split your brand presence, potentially impacting trust or engagement (e.g., users not recognizing the subdomain as part of your site).
• Subdirectories – Pros:
  
  • Consolidated SEO authority: All content shares the main domain’s reputation, so new sections can rank faster and benefit from existing backlinks.
  • Unified site architecture: Easier to implement site-wide features (navigation, link structures) and beneficial for crawl efficiency since search engines crawl one site, not many.
  • Simplified tracking: One analytics property can cover the whole site, and user journeys are tracked end-to-end. Likewise, one Search Console view covers all content.
  • Lower technical complexity: No need for separate hosting or distinct CMS unless you choose to; deploying changes or security updates happens in one codebase.
  • Better user experience continuity: Users stay on the same domain, which fosters trust and makes navigation between sections feel natural. The brand remains front-and-center in the URL.
• Subdirectories – Cons:
  
  • Less flexibility for divergence: Harder to use a completely different tech stack or design for one part of the site (though not impossible). If one part of the site has an issue (server down, security flaw), it could potentially affect the whole site.
  • If not organized well, a complex subdirectory structure can become confusing (but this is an information architecture challenge solvable with planning).
  • In a few cases, extremely large sites might hit limits of their server or CMS by keeping everything together – though modern scalable architecture and use of microservices can mitigate this without needing separate domains.
  • Mergers/Acquisitions scenario: If you acquire another company and want to merge their site as a section of yours (subdirectory), it can involve heavy migration. Some choose to just link out or keep a separate domain to avoid that work initially.

Overall, for most typical scenarios, subdirectories’ pros (SEO strength, simplicity, UX) outweigh their cons, whereas subdomains should be used only when their specific pros are truly needed to meet business or technical requirements.

Key Takeaways and Recommendations

For businesses deciding between subdomains and subdirectories, here are the key takeaways and actionable recommendations:

1. Consolidate When Possible: In the majority of cases, keep your content under one domain using subdirectories. This consolidates SEO equity and typically leads to better search rankings and organic traffic growth, as demonstrated by multiple case studies (e.g., Monster.com’s 116% visibility boost). A unified site is easier for Google to crawl and for your team to manage.
2. Use Subdomains Strategically: Consider a subdomain only if the section truly warrants separation – for example, a different product or service that targets a distinct audience, a user-generated content section, a separate language site where a local team will handle SEO, or a portion of the site requiring a different infrastructure for technical reasons. Even then, weigh the cost. If the content is still closely related to your main business (e.g., a blog with industry tips), resist the temptation to silo it off – it will likely perform better embedded in your main site.
3. Maintain Strong Internal Linking: If you do deploy a subdomain, link to it prominently from your main site (and link back from the subdomain to the main site). This helps users navigate and signals to search engines that it’s part of the same family. Lack of linking can cause Google to treat subdomains completely independently, which is usually not what you want. For example, include the subdomain section in your top navigation or footer.
4. Keep User Experience Consistent: Ensure that the user experience is not jarringly different on a subdomain. Use consistent branding (logo, color scheme) and mention the connection to the main site. For instance, if support.example.com is your help center, the header can say “Example.com Support.” This continuity will build trust and encourage users to move between the subdomain and main site without confusion, aiding engagement and conversions.
5. Unify Analytics and Monitoring: Set up your analytics to track across subdomains if you use them, or ideally use one property for the whole site. The same goes for SEO monitoring – use domain-level views when available. Regularly review performance for each subdomain and compare it to equivalent subdirectory sections (if any) to ensure you’re not seeing an unexpected drop. If a subdomain isn’t performing as expected, be ready to adjust strategy – sometimes the right answer is to fold it back into the main site.
6. Plan for Algorithm Updates: Be aware that Google evaluates site quality holistically. Don’t try to sidestep content quality issues by shoving content onto a subdomain. With updates like the Helpful Content system, low-quality or unsupervised content on a subdomain can still harm your main site . It’s better to maintain high standards across all sections or keep questionable content noindexed or off your main domain entirely. Conversely, high-quality content anywhere on your site (subfolder or subdomain) contributes to your overall authority and reputation.
7. Consider Branding Implications: Discuss with your marketing and brand team how you want users to perceive your web properties. If you desire one strong brand presence, subfolders will reinforce that. If you have multiple brand personas under one corporate umbrella, subdomains might help differentiate them – but be cautious not to spread your brand too thin online. Often, a single site with clear sections can still serve multiple personas without needing separate subdomains.
8. Test and Monitor if Uncertain: If the decision is not clear-cut, you could pilot one approach and measure results. For example, if you’re launching a new content section and are unsure, you might put it in a folder initially (which is low-friction) and see how it indexes and ranks. Or if starting on a subdomain (due to a certain platform need), monitor its SEO performance closely. If it struggles, be prepared to migrate it sooner rather than later. Always implement 301 redirects for any URL moves and monitor Google Search Console for crawling/indexing issues during transitions.
9. Don’t Overlook Practicality: Finally, choose an approach that your organization can reasonably implement and maintain. A perfectly SEO-optimal structure that your dev team finds impossible to integrate might do more harm than good if it delays content launches or leads to technical debt. Sometimes “well-executed subdomain” can beat “poorly executed subfolder” if the latter means a tangled site. That said, with proper planning most teams can manage subdirectories just fine. Align the decision with your team’s capabilities, but keep the long-term vision of your web presence in mind.

By considering these points, you can make an informed decision that balances technical SEO best practices with business realities. In 2024, the trend leans toward consolidation for strength, but ‘it depends’ still applies – use the structure that best serves your content and users, and ensure whichever path you take is executed with diligence. The ultimate goal is the same: provide valuable content on a site that users and search engines trust. Whether it’s on example.com or info.example.com, achieving that goal is what will drive your SEO success.

Elevate your SEO strategy with Datastrom's expertise.

Our team will assess your website's structure and content, aligning technical SEO best practices with your business goals. We'll guide you through the complexities of site consolidation or subdomain structuring, ensuring your content is accessible, valuable, and optimized for search engines.

‍Don't leave your SEO success to chance - partner with Datastrom today and achieve your online potential.